Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:03

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Watch: Moment crowd boos and cheers Trump at Kennedy Center - BBC

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Can Benadryl cause a false positive for benzodiazepines?

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Why do philosophy of physics when you can do physics itself? - Aeon

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Alex Cooper Accuses Former Soccer Coach of Sexual Harassment in Call Her Alex - Vulture

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Why do you like Justin Trudeau when he's hated in Canada?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Debitis voluptas voluptatem ea sit.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Can relationship issues cause depression?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

What’s next?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Bond Yields Keeping Climbing. Governments Can Bring Them Down. - Barron's

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Thank you.

Facial Stimulation Clears Brain Waste and Boosts Aging Minds - Neuroscience News